New Developments in Employee Participation: An Analysis of the Recent Chamber Letter

Introduction

In a recent Chamber letter, dated September 23, 2024, the State Secretary for Finance – Taxation and the Tax Administration, Folkert L. Idsinga, shared important insights regarding the state of financial employee participation in the Netherlands. This letter, which arises from a motion submitted during the General Political Debate of September 21, 2023, offers an in-depth analysis of the obstacles hindering employee participation and the potential role of the government in promoting it. For companies considering establishing employee participation plans, such as those served by RoundE, this Chamber letter provides valuable insights into the current situation and possible future developments in this area.

The Reason and the Research

The Chamber letter is the result of a broad research initiative conducted in collaboration with the Labor Foundation, which includes both employee and employer organizations. The research focused not only on profit sharing but on financial employee participation in a broad sense. This included discussions, presentations from experts, and a comprehensive analysis of the current situation. The aim was to identify the obstacles to granting financial employee participation to employees and how these can be potentially removed. This broad approach ensures that the findings provide a complete picture of the challenges and opportunities regarding employee participation in the Netherlands.

Free decision aid

There are 6 ways to let employees share in the growth of the company.

Which form suits your company?

Take the decision aid

Forms and Advantages and Disadvantages of Employee Participation

The Chamber letter describes various forms of financial employee participation, ranging from profit sharing to actual co-ownership. Interestingly, both employer and employee representatives see benefits in granting financial employee participations. These benefits include increased employee motivation, greater attachment to the company, and assistance in retaining employees. Particularly for startups and scale-ups, employee participation is seen as a valuable tool for offering competitive compensation and retaining talent. At the same time, potential downsides are also noted, such as a changed risk allocation between the company and employees, which requires (financial) flexibility from employees. This balance between advantages and disadvantages underscores the importance of careful consideration when implementing employee participation plans.

Identified Obstacles and Possible Solutions

One of the most notable findings from the research is that fiscal or other types of obstacles do not seem to play a prominent role in companies' decisions to forgo employee participation. Instead, a lack of information and awareness is cited as a significant hindering factor. This presents opportunities for organizations like RoundE to play an educational role in informing companies about the possibilities and benefits of employee participation.

Nevertheless, the Chamber letter mentions four specific practical obstacles that particularly apply to employee participations leading to ownership:

1. The valuation of non-listed companies
2. Long processing times for requests for prior consultation on valuation
3. The impact of a potential capital gains tax in box 3
4. The non-deductibility of employee participations in corporate tax

For each of these obstacles, the letter outlines possible directions for solutions or next steps. For instance, considerations are being made to develop guidelines for the valuation of non-listed companies and the possibility of facilitating the devaluation of shares with a transfer prohibition for non-listed companies as well. These steps could simplify the implementation of employee participation plans in the future.

The Role of the Government and Future Developments

A significant point reiterated in the Chamber letter is that the cabinet views the decision on whether or not to financially involve employees primarily as part of the labor conditions negotiations between employers and employees. The government does not see it as its role to promote certain forms of wages more than others. However, the cabinet acknowledges its responsibility in addressing bottlenecks in implementation that are within its reach. This position emphasizes the importance of good advice and guidance by external parties, such as RoundE, in setting up employee participation plans.

The Chamber letter concludes with the commitment that the cabinet will continue to engage with social partners and other stakeholders about possible obstacles. This offers prospects for further developments and improvements in the future. For companies considering employee participation, it is therefore advisable to closely monitor the developments in this area and utilize the expertise of specialists to optimally shape their plans.

Conclusion

The recent Chamber letter on financial employee participations offers valuable insights into the current state of affairs and future developments in this area. Although obstacles remain, particularly concerning valuation and tax treatment, the government demonstrates a willingness to address bottlenecks and simplify the implementation of employee participation plans. For companies contemplating financially involving their employees, this is a favorable moment to explore the possibilities. With the right guidance and advice, companies can benefit from the advantages of employee participation while preparing for any future changes in laws and regulations. At RoundE, we continue to closely monitor these developments to optimally support our clients in implementing successful employee participation plans.